{"id":"W1977720604","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.01115","title":"Measuring Preferences for Health Care Interventions Using Conjoint Analysis: An Application to HIV Testing","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Services Research","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":226,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Services and Policy Research","funders":"National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Conjoint analysis; Willingness to pay; Preference; Test (biology); Consistency (knowledge bases); Ordered probit; Actuarial science; Psychology; Statistics; Medicine; Applied psychology; Econometrics; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04085364,0.001377407,0.001368303,0.003531173,0.001393011,0.002249345,0.001317894,0.001220167,0.004382722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09028422,0.0005233874,0.002718583,0.005461206,0.001281508,0.001554599,0.002392356,0.00178624,0.00036824],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002381536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00197915,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002020863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003316312,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9396027,0.05386708,0.001536267,0.0007956334,0.003630019,0.0005682086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9071997,0.08115187,0.005005075,0.002772449,0.003091725,0.0007792229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006863567,0.006067166,0.1639775,0.004774938,0.002924803,0.0006491924,0.01440875,0.06204866,0.003594925,0.01081273,0.00397536,0.7199025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002164275,0.01701401,0.3284364,0.002601038,0.001700212,0.00151995,0.01864042,0.5238276,0.00933479,0.08410747,0.009618223,0.001035663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7651616,0.002262912,0.2106927,0.001711832,0.0001730963,0.009951969,0.001597876,0.0002795075,0.00816847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7499196,0.0008575926,0.2429563,0.0002451153,0.00004137887,0.005305786,0.0002227378,0.0000164436,0.0004351337],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04085364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2160572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6193771472628452,"score_gpt":0.4312965545459327,"score_spread":0.1880805927169125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}