{"id":"W1977850141","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2013.10.010","title":"Electronic health record acceptance by physicians: Testing an integrated theoretical model","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","topic":"Electronic Health Records Systems","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":245,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Université Laval; Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Technology acceptance model; Psychosocial; Usability; Specialty; Structural equation modeling; Variance (accounting); Electronic health record; Family medicine; Psychology; Medicine; Health records; Health information technology; Health care; Computer science; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03168442,0.001050389,0.001248456,0.002561178,0.002902673,0.006873588,0.003950623,0.004246299,0.01971382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1966089,0.001133631,0.002086285,0.002288639,0.006320935,0.01112003,0.00691341,0.003639469,0.001503045],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005295843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006887665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006553061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9612771,0.02447465,0.001955808,0.004487809,0.005636626,0.00216807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5722861,0.3735329,0.0206712,0.014295,0.01546959,0.003745161],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008475126,0.03290039,0.7752806,0.0008973,0.00120836,0.0002615652,0.02848821,0.007677001,0.0008526422,0.07324131,0.001438423,0.06927903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00925001,0.01624631,0.5648448,0.00109813,0.003180162,0.0006917392,0.07056104,0.2244808,0.003575194,0.1015741,0.004103364,0.0003943464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859034,0.00004775744,0.003949119,0.001395697,0.00003627987,0.0003714984,0.0001023614,0.00001887324,0.008175028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961812,0.00003046493,0.002623634,0.0002177271,0.00001796749,0.0004117836,0.0001301731,0.00001164393,0.0003753422],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03168442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1675652,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03917361619206767,"score_gpt":0.3979412814023379,"score_spread":0.3587676652102703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}