{"id":"W1977991913","doi":"10.1080/02755947.2014.938140","title":"Assessing Distribution of Migratory Fishes and Connectivity following Complete and Partial Dam Removals in a North Carolina River","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"North American Journal of Fisheries Management","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; University of Windsor","keywords":"Dorosoma; Gizzard shad; Alosa; Fishery; Habitat; Flathead; Fish migration; Tributary; Catfish; Weir; Environmental science; Hydrology (agriculture); Geography; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002200448,0.0001136448,0.0001488691,0.000730004,0.0006612203,0.0002924418,0.0004352132,0.0002050478,0.0008897781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000814728,0.0001152383,0.0001643485,0.0006015893,0.0003419821,0.0002368113,0.0006158937,0.000221341,0.000117005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001359567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001028426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2062351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5385891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998324,0.00002132679,0.000008860417,0.00003962977,0.00005539192,0.00004240797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989544,0.0001195683,0.0003800532,0.000041084,0.0002983686,0.0002064773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008272356,0.0000377988,0.9872497,0.00001827054,0.00002706212,0.0001914368,0.0009996139,0.0004767643,0.004726343,0.00002441571,0.0002867132,0.005879276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.11279e-7,0.00002324852,0.9990188,0.000002921127,0.00000303448,0.00001313916,0.0005162819,0.0002158594,0.00008096419,0.000002787417,0.0001201651,0.000002246838],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996707,0.000008503675,0.00003091565,0.000007621352,4.141166e-7,0.000002939061,0.00006859224,0.000003598554,0.0002067168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991488,0.00001913335,0.0001439464,0.000011676,7.757466e-7,0.00001301473,0.0002217068,0.000001277976,0.0004394799],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2062351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4100695,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01069664816343156,"score_gpt":0.2183157643052313,"score_spread":0.2076191161417998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}