{"id":"W1978117619","doi":"10.1139/f10-046","title":"Diversity and complexity of angler behaviour drive socially optimal input and output regulations in a bioeconomic recreational-fisheries model","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":210,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fishing; Sustainability; Fisheries management; Fishery; Pike; Population; Recreational fishing; Recreation; Welfare; Business; Environmental resource management; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Natural resource economics; Economics; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005273323,0.00006687046,0.000208095,0.0001763654,0.0005150987,0.00005836945,0.00009224146,0.00004898639,0.00007411612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006222687,0.00007288613,0.0000248235,0.00005685902,0.001245598,0.0005010616,0.00005930119,0.00008058197,5.454564e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004292243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001368143,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008111693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03929676,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993742,0.000008829902,0.0003412164,0.000135362,0.00002569749,0.000114718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994912,0.00003600275,0.0002848512,0.00004621144,0.000009863961,0.0001318693],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002558058,0.000005963616,0.9787372,0.000003178928,0.000006553911,4.919278e-7,0.003601294,0.0001102848,0.000005535437,0.01695876,0.00003781736,0.0005303385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002198966,0.00006200049,0.9377856,0.000009298494,0.000006045772,0.00000774857,0.001002886,0.01615763,0.000005413653,0.04460594,0.00005811267,0.00007943555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965811,0.000221328,0.0001909703,0.002107453,0.00008549447,0.00005753331,0.00003409059,8.225662e-7,0.0007211409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950256,0.00009677382,0.004706088,0.0000740021,0.00001673676,8.883397e-7,0.0000016348,0.000002826494,0.00007544391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04095163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1312845002311372,"score_gpt":0.2197455294761223,"score_spread":0.08846102924498511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}