{"id":"W1978164654","doi":"10.1109/sami.2012.6208966","title":"A new adaptive evidential reasoning approach for network alarm correlation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software System Performance and Reliability","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Spurious relationship; Computer science; ALARM; Evidential reasoning approach; Dempster–Shafer theory; Data mining; Constant false alarm rate; False alarm; Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Identification (biology); Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Decision support system; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007091599,0.00009782474,0.0001279654,0.0000264544,0.0001553876,0.00006476441,0.0002851862,0.00008084867,0.00001278691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003802785,0.00007572482,0.00008261685,0.0002337097,0.0000107486,0.001081699,0.00009883905,0.00007381762,0.00003642859],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004613155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006479904,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007171386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001933538,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990181,0.00004014254,0.0001871813,0.0002213737,0.0001746907,0.0003584869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999313,0.0001028754,0.00008031982,0.0003141437,0.00006331498,0.0001263485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001476276,0.0002297236,0.3041144,0.00010568,0.0001393038,4.370359e-7,0.005156948,0.04881993,0.00002063158,0.2625696,0.1316407,0.247055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004433682,0.0000961186,0.01794001,0.00003388495,0.00001725303,0.00001419239,0.00005992995,0.9757998,0.00007026851,0.0008262664,0.004477839,0.000221087],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001012842,0.0003653434,0.9934016,0.00003946215,0.001287649,0.0004119447,2.421971e-7,0.0002074509,0.003273405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4856565,0.000002297555,0.512618,0.00005842304,0.0008839083,0.00002939782,0.000002965008,0.000004737699,0.0007437784],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9269798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3087969,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02195683908915171,"score_gpt":0.2516264050813626,"score_spread":0.2296695659922109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}