{"id":"W1978211740","doi":"10.1109/wamicon.2006.351952","title":"A comparison between different FHSS techniques for use in a multiple access secure wireless sensor network","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Chaos control and synchronization","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Wireless sensor network; Computer network; Computer science; Detector; Node (physics); Key distribution in wireless sensor networks; Wireless; Wireless ad hoc network; Spread spectrum; Wireless network; Engineering; Telecommunications; Code division multiple access","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006370579,0.0001597584,0.0003267292,0.0000441005,0.00008396352,0.0001426044,0.000122208,0.00005558173,0.00004257575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002197017,0.0001315391,0.00008304833,0.0001211327,0.00001636366,0.0001782722,0.00004935942,0.00009372623,0.000001624464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003220009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001302058,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00181127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001317568,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990695,0.00003683749,0.0003081428,0.0002209801,0.00008407587,0.0002804229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994618,0.0002128945,0.00009676011,0.0001404062,0.00005301728,0.00003507487],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002260163,0.0001201456,0.9829285,0.00001038997,0.00001692206,1.516499e-7,0.00002631447,0.0005898183,0.0001308552,0.003010199,0.001537114,0.011607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00281363,0.0000769269,0.7387501,0.00009278062,0.0000564344,1.108423e-7,0.00008666317,0.23467,0.01002501,0.006997233,0.005869118,0.0005620313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6029243,0.000007794583,0.3960608,0.00006438819,0.00003125482,0.0005215924,0.0000436643,0.00005659142,0.0002895519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963932,3.68385e-7,0.001779305,0.00002000896,0.0009799241,0.0001561447,0.0003883633,0.00002043653,0.0002622621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3942815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5364008,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03254281653173527,"score_gpt":0.2925968291210047,"score_spread":0.2600540125892694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}