{"id":"W1978310520","doi":"10.1080/21580103.2013.801174","title":"Estimating carbon stocks in Korean forests between 2010 and 2110: a prediction based on forest volume–age relationships","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Science and Technology","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Larix kaempferi; Pinus koraiensis; Forest inventory; Carbon stock; Environmental science; Forestry; Thinning; Carbon sequestration; Pinus densiflora; Stock (firearms); Larix gmelinii; Geography; Climate change; Larch; Forest management; Ecology; Biology; Carbon dioxide; Botany","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007795573,0.0001571021,0.0001634724,0.0005199576,0.0004553632,0.00005351893,0.0003076257,0.0002125663,0.00004632698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004524733,0.0001419953,0.00001198728,0.001053301,0.002045119,0.0003906331,0.0003306112,0.0003721601,0.00006156675],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001500116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002718281,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001206391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01193998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984384,0.00002911113,0.0002400588,0.0005441302,0.000276011,0.0004723211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993794,0.00007906443,0.00009105502,0.0003233962,0.00001917375,0.0001078953],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003151136,0.00002968247,0.9875824,0.000005935252,0.000001518981,0.000006901907,0.00005746542,0.00471994,0.00004453858,0.00409162,0.000268149,0.003188647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002556849,0.0002363443,0.7242145,0.00001857587,0.000006482214,0.000003723989,0.00004002654,0.2266865,0.00001615975,0.04833834,0.00008418722,0.00009949892],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931184,0.000007695391,0.001653298,0.001829102,0.0001174014,0.0006486097,0.000002562629,0.0001143147,0.002508601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967449,0.000001841199,0.002802592,0.00006689887,0.00001755644,0.0001722672,0.000006674116,0.000009603336,0.0001777056],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.263368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7535326,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009342514757615272,"score_gpt":0.2070452672728886,"score_spread":0.1977027525152733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}