{"id":"W1978353383","doi":"10.1016/s0001-4575(01)00043-4","title":"Pedestrian risk decrease with pedestrian flow. A case study based on data from signalized intersections in Hamilton, Ontario","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accident Analysis & Prevention","topic":"Traffic and Road Safety","field":"Engineering","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Luleå Tekniska Universitet; University of Toronto; Connaught Fund; Ford Foundation","keywords":"Pedestrian; Intersection (aeronautics); Transport engineering; Channelized; Traffic flow (computer networking); Pedestrian crossing; Poison control; Engineering; Simulation; Computer science; Telecommunications; Computer security; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005086884,0.0002058749,0.0002240031,0.000645937,0.00117493,0.0008149333,0.0005413688,0.0004876702,0.001144591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002883027,0.0002820341,0.000377288,0.002178773,0.0006456659,0.0003593594,0.0005543024,0.0003180438,0.0001344464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007725249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005836695,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.950381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9809417,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992558,0.0001881583,0.00003627191,0.00009849474,0.0002566121,0.0001646968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984624,0.0003025666,0.0003199686,0.0001242751,0.0006416453,0.0001490688],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001178781,0.00004109088,0.9916877,0.00002109178,0.00004061053,0.0004937156,0.001459989,0.0004238362,0.0003154162,0.0001474477,0.0005250276,0.004726114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006727173,0.00003430065,0.9975117,0.000005170332,0.00002376988,0.0001444327,0.001151407,0.0005065554,0.00008043685,0.00002816322,0.0005018698,0.000005466482],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978908,0.00008979178,0.0002076251,0.00009176111,0.000001830121,0.00003025631,0.0004317326,0.000004284261,0.001251904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989856,0.00006672082,0.000210244,0.00001196815,0.000001502737,0.000009543122,0.000189802,0.000001374215,0.0005233259],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04961902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0998224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03656913715013043,"score_gpt":0.2561894794822859,"score_spread":0.2196203423321554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}