{"id":"W1978430716","doi":"10.1103/physreva.72.020302","title":"Exact entanglement cost of multiqubit bound entangled states","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review A","topic":"Quantum Information and Cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Multipartite entanglement; Quantum entanglement; Multipartite; Squashed entanglement; W state; Upper and lower bounds; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Class (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Quantum mechanics; Bound state; Mathematics; Statistical physics; Physics; Computer science; Algorithm; Quantum; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002134054,0.0006224473,0.001107022,0.001220895,0.001315126,0.0023016,0.001580996,0.001495801,0.005473569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01164857,0.000451783,0.0005216828,0.001210262,0.003352661,0.004541936,0.001884348,0.002024001,0.0002403404],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002675599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001161065,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008160896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008634095,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986401,0.0003269914,0.00005032321,0.0001952063,0.0004317852,0.000355505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933343,0.004954763,0.0002774219,0.0009272478,0.0002891287,0.0002170664],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003952351,0.0001194448,0.001114702,0.00015854,0.00004248246,0.0002009187,0.000111553,0.2646033,0.008658743,0.7173352,0.0007046366,0.006555167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003869917,0.0000547179,0.0008127562,0.00003763745,0.00002027033,0.00007609582,0.00003963254,0.7981981,0.01268821,0.1875564,0.0004313042,0.00004620038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8722083,0.0007916422,0.1057532,0.000936156,0.0001211819,0.00006534941,0.0003344139,0.0002983902,0.01949142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945199,0.00009634381,0.004531056,0.0000346801,0.00001183621,0.00004030535,0.00008281581,0.00004504464,0.0006380268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005473569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01941288,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01549491803297595,"score_gpt":0.3102864761333585,"score_spread":0.2947915581003826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}