{"id":"W1978449343","doi":"10.1177/002221940103400204","title":"Accuracy of Teacher Assessments of Second-Language Students at Risk for Reading Disability","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Reading (process); Referral; Learning disability; Spelling; At-risk students; Reading disability; Standardized test; Language assessment; Rating scale; Special education; Mathematics education; Developmental psychology; Dyslexia; Linguistics; Medicine; Family medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002990482,0.0003010839,0.000371099,0.001199486,0.0002106126,0.0006452374,0.0004201871,0.0004303087,0.0007244684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03738317,0.0002410592,0.0002607449,0.0003081112,0.0003498945,0.0004684064,0.0004586544,0.0004141679,0.0007812529],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003828274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003799477,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008341496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01132937,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997095,0.001093539,0.0003324398,0.0004419061,0.0008641551,0.0001729792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9763042,0.0089729,0.006273516,0.001850892,0.005731377,0.0008671209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002021785,0.00004457907,0.9774564,0.00003051202,0.0000224831,0.00007597959,0.0009440933,0.0001186295,0.0009452446,0.00001796036,0.0002954346,0.01984658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001676441,0.0003488357,0.9946182,0.00004199358,0.00002475961,0.0005919337,0.0006873786,0.001127486,0.001567968,0.00003229323,0.0009321602,0.00001033129],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996887,0.0002986073,0.000717261,0.00009817367,0.00002522843,0.00001807683,0.0001582811,0.00007939648,0.001717963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984127,0.0001469728,0.0005718932,0.00002537121,0.000007447166,0.00001123524,0.000225516,0.000009396026,0.0005893649],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008341496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01658589,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02956639806488814,"score_gpt":0.396809651348661,"score_spread":0.3672432532837729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}