{"id":"W1978449343","doi":"10.1177/002221940103400204","title":"Accuracy of Teacher Assessments of Second-Language Students at Risk for Reading Disability","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Reading (process); Referral; Learning disability; Spelling; At-risk students; Reading disability; Standardized test; Language assessment; Rating scale; Special education; Mathematics education; Developmental psychology; Dyslexia; Linguistics; Medicine; Family medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002505517,0.0001891258,0.0006081344,0.0001054442,0.0001128762,0.00003005602,0.000376461,0.0001028422,0.002225812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002270798,0.0001544682,0.000321794,0.0001305018,0.0002666462,0.0002304414,0.00008903256,0.0004263938,0.000007983808],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000262926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004672723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009706373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001617655,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971956,0.0005484556,0.001253338,0.0002242382,0.0004755232,0.0003028449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952522,0.002534376,0.001586696,0.0003157968,0.000213994,0.00009695812],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007532056,0.0006861914,0.9409936,0.000163712,0.0003581847,0.000003186999,0.04273676,0.00007582996,0.0006632601,0.000116475,0.0006191759,0.01283041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002180671,0.001097717,0.8940004,0.0002804213,0.0001445301,0.00006829916,0.08348007,0.00002705223,0.0005726846,0.0003949026,0.01752178,0.0002315138],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943129,0.0003639964,0.0001727595,0.00004675354,0.0005017062,0.0002229977,0.00001988816,0.00001395197,0.004345005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818021,0.00003770261,0.0009079123,0.000008972173,0.0001591656,0.00001464935,0.000007791434,0.00002678161,0.01703493],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04699324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986863,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02956639806488814,"score_gpt":0.396809651348661,"score_spread":0.3672432532837729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}