{"id":"W1978535276","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2014.07.059","title":"COMPARING THE AMBULATORY CARE AND OUTCOMES FOR RURAL AND URBAN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE: A POPULATION-BASED COHORT STUDY","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Ambulatory; Coronary artery disease; Rurality; Cohort; Ambulatory care; Emergency medicine; Retrospective cohort study; Population; Cohort study; Emergency department; Odds ratio; Health care; Internal medicine; Rural area; Environmental health; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001001855,0.0005473426,0.0007303749,0.001002679,0.001180786,0.001299251,0.0007748035,0.001316926,0.002017218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002466086,0.0008075205,0.001462911,0.002238645,0.0005252608,0.001313004,0.001038916,0.00163154,0.000347414],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007735179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008182263,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04037057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04403926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989361,0.0002933855,0.00008685819,0.0002751524,0.0001523858,0.0002561339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981996,0.0002472877,0.0005562006,0.0001805931,0.0002315875,0.0005847673],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003162645,0.0001978155,0.9983552,0.000006906982,0.000221593,0.00009619572,0.0001848289,0.00002101161,0.0001505335,0.00001599214,0.00009410177,0.0003395451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002982014,0.0001999897,0.9988425,0.000002663991,0.0000635788,0.00008570783,0.0005975248,0.0000877909,0.00001286672,0.00001341991,0.00005780492,0.000006466221],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994075,0.00005491571,0.00002978674,0.00003516755,0.00000606799,0.000008297456,0.00027073,0.000001292981,0.0001861605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993429,0.00005307641,0.00003459259,0.00004147652,0.00001223609,0.00001122773,0.000360478,0.000002044238,0.0001420233],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04037057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08027118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02489765718434044,"score_gpt":0.3315753969145519,"score_spread":0.3066777397302115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}