{"id":"W1978569502","doi":"10.3164/jcbn.12-75","title":"Method for assessing X-ray-induced hydroxyl radical-scavenging activity of biological compounds/materials","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition","topic":"Electron Spin Resonance Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Particle Physics","funders":"","keywords":"Hydroxyl radical; Chemistry; Antioxidant; Scavenging; Ascorbic acid; Biological activity; Scavenger; Spin trapping; Radical; Hydroxyl value; Electron paramagnetic resonance; Organic chemistry; Biochemistry; Food science; In vitro","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001668453,0.001462939,0.0006566634,0.002210145,0.0006351301,0.0005225604,0.001093987,0.001530172,0.002059126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001222725,0.0006676363,0.0006254605,0.0006376773,0.0005297311,0.0007149469,0.0006547509,0.001823449,0.001264312],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003473059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007900203,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003500406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007385447,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982525,0.000462091,0.0001687278,0.0003931358,0.0006347938,0.00008880587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987845,0.0002917004,0.0002207206,0.0001738502,0.0004392774,0.00008998351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001238412,0.0001080238,0.000777268,0.0006877025,0.00005226372,0.0001097928,0.00008848724,0.0001168715,0.972881,0.0006827046,0.0004223807,0.02394965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005602593,0.0008859587,0.003485697,0.00008487437,0.0001252705,0.0009662184,0.00006703291,0.001951138,0.9769859,0.0004698475,0.01486738,0.00005467431],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0709384,0.01863928,0.9012558,0.000453689,0.0009086184,0.001513503,0.0006709592,0.001848884,0.003770884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1724604,0.008518684,0.8028203,0.0004638098,0.0001351969,0.00324634,0.001156538,0.0001295394,0.01106917],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002210145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008823752,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05466464792055475,"score_gpt":0.4025413943276909,"score_spread":0.3478767464071362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}