{"id":"W1978569644","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0203-2","title":"Policy convergence under approval and plurality voting: the role of policy commitment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Cardinal voting systems; Bullet voting; Disapproval voting; Commit; Context (archaeology); Incentive; Approval voting; Anti-plurality voting; Candidacy; Political science; Competition (biology); Economics; Proportional representation; Politics; Public economics; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Democracy; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000254796,0.0000683029,0.0001175669,0.00002258903,0.000876925,0.00004358601,0.00007205859,0.00007691405,0.00002775737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009725449,0.00005168665,0.00003476919,0.0001987665,0.0003985419,0.0000743958,0.00002947361,0.00006895261,0.0000013495],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006087691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009275845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3428069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01898209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991173,0.0001815607,0.0001579905,0.0001057999,0.0001873347,0.0002500114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996567,0.00009468252,0.00007555541,0.00004822117,0.00006226776,0.00006251357],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002099328,0.00001728566,0.0768478,0.00001237361,0.000006216869,4.066161e-8,0.002178945,7.502651e-7,0.00006074413,0.9195774,0.00008205585,0.001214248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002209896,0.0000318354,0.8383935,0.000008200069,0.00002170937,2.683304e-7,0.006053463,0.00003235797,0.00008024124,0.09690146,0.05812539,0.0001306056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9209505,0.0002079534,0.000008369801,0.05682883,0.00004834948,0.000225687,0.00001943887,0.00002414468,0.02168668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981889,0.000005359533,0.000002701051,0.0002124344,0.001230879,0.0000104007,0.000003618917,0.000004189389,0.0003415304],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.822676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0248374912654548,"score_gpt":0.3375303567993648,"score_spread":0.31269286553391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}