{"id":"W1978569644","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0203-2","title":"Policy convergence under approval and plurality voting: the role of policy commitment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Cardinal voting systems; Bullet voting; Disapproval voting; Commit; Context (archaeology); Incentive; Approval voting; Anti-plurality voting; Candidacy; Political science; Competition (biology); Economics; Proportional representation; Politics; Public economics; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Democracy; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03532883,0.000487584,0.002555821,0.002298905,0.003381709,0.009310788,0.00195961,0.00383141,0.01778151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1124716,0.0005476679,0.001034666,0.001599185,0.008952391,0.008450528,0.007487647,0.005517688,0.0008828372],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003060008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00367789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002687368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002016382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9734827,0.0184327,0.0006122463,0.002135936,0.001579,0.003757427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9019319,0.07446384,0.007212709,0.007013475,0.005523853,0.003854236],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007945464,0.0002742447,0.008364413,0.0001251691,0.0001269434,0.000162657,0.003053841,0.01266811,0.0005004748,0.9472421,0.001442613,0.02524483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001835251,0.0001390807,0.007236328,0.00005100669,0.00005617161,0.0000475044,0.002768938,0.02538648,0.0004382761,0.9620235,0.001642881,0.00002624996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8036406,0.0005478345,0.05918072,0.01313174,0.0001998754,0.000178322,0.0001372364,0.0001130572,0.1228707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959981,0.00007539303,0.001412802,0.0001825104,0.00007995882,0.00005679692,0.00002137776,0.00002109046,0.002152017],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03532883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.186839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0248374912654548,"score_gpt":0.3375303567993648,"score_spread":0.31269286553391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}