{"id":"W1978786685","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.050","title":"Trends in the timing and magnitude of floods in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrology","topic":"Hydrology and Drought Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":190,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Hydro-Québec; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council; Conestoga College","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Snowmelt; Magnitude (astronomy); Flood myth; Environmental science; Trend analysis; Climatology; Seasonality; Streamflow; Hydrology (agriculture); Physical geography; Flash flood; Geography; Drainage basin; Meteorology; Geology; Snow; Statistics; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003945612,0.0001799585,0.0002700388,0.001889864,0.001310136,0.001296415,0.0006938024,0.0005464491,0.001969651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002105237,0.0002577669,0.0002862852,0.003703139,0.0007107693,0.0004801841,0.0005320325,0.0006833037,0.0002194985],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01383457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01680859,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954132,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996183,0.00001426301,0.00003865694,0.00006530764,0.0001383413,0.000125174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962857,0.0003136122,0.0005841481,0.00006988351,0.002216256,0.0005303759],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002503539,0.00003682352,0.9833834,0.00005480946,0.0001165334,0.0000998652,0.0008959379,0.0009442202,0.00126797,0.0004118169,0.003616949,0.008921314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000376862,0.000006778284,0.9977142,0.000008066226,0.00001317379,0.00002083379,0.0004193168,0.0004390042,0.00009451959,0.00002420504,0.001249076,0.000007019342],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886804,0.0007726227,0.0001032088,0.001016696,0.00001969659,0.000008421012,0.007373707,0.00003557765,0.001989658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953745,0.0005337813,0.0001305095,0.00007896295,0.00001073176,0.000003957474,0.002380746,0.000007397173,0.00147938],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01383457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1003773,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007852324140084783,"score_gpt":0.2298806348816115,"score_spread":0.2220283107415267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}