{"id":"W1978823318","doi":"10.1139/f2012-041","title":"Assessing brown trout (<i>Salmo trutta</i>) spawning movements with multistate capture–recapture models: a case study in a fully controlled Belgian brook","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Salmo; Electrofishing; Brown trout; Mark and recapture; Tributary; Fishery; Homing (biology); Trout; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Geography; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Population; Cartography; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003569535,0.0008950027,0.000792992,0.0004250428,0.0006463262,0.0009958295,0.00118558,0.0008866561,0.0005303197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003643973,0.0006419289,0.00105572,0.0003664138,0.0006491378,0.0006682933,0.0005720565,0.0004980345,0.00006684102],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002422081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00172934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2422112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1885571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992054,0.0004442003,0.00004158813,0.0001408083,0.00004407811,0.0001239567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957291,0.003249256,0.0003650719,0.0002032992,0.0002847934,0.0001683421],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003028837,0.0003048478,0.08399293,0.00004039519,0.0002397097,0.0002491239,0.000137265,0.9092102,0.001308268,0.0005075574,0.0001023622,0.003604431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007214393,0.0003054727,0.03924774,0.000008407163,0.00009986195,0.00003518765,0.0001129019,0.9590599,0.0005829511,0.0002685676,0.000172824,0.00003395199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962132,0.00003956624,0.003433308,0.00001993317,0.000001834717,0.00002652706,0.0001129873,0.00002066073,0.0001320382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995086,0.00003744159,0.004293604,0.000005388019,0.000002592045,0.0000309101,0.0002154333,0.000008831367,0.0003197628],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2422112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4816027,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02520806148124575,"score_gpt":0.2405498892468228,"score_spread":0.2153418277655771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}