{"id":"W1978998201","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.006","title":"Investigating the accuracy of Bayesian techniques for before–after safety studies: The case of a “no treatment” evaluation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accident Analysis & Prevention","topic":"Traffic and Road Safety","field":"Engineering","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Bayes' theorem; Bayesian probability; Observational study; Collision; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Stability (learning theory); Selection (genetic algorithm); Data mining; Poison control; Outcome (game theory); Statistics; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00152095,0.0001329827,0.0002859093,0.0001152044,0.00008945722,0.00001327744,0.0001217121,0.00005117855,0.00002359118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003359762,0.00007364669,0.0003453899,0.0004962528,0.00005377526,0.0001748075,0.00002978287,0.00004917234,0.00000133037],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001597836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003987913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001387756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005199705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988347,0.000166053,0.0005495687,0.0001351449,0.0001962028,0.0001183004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988056,0.0002145836,0.0002496979,0.000339872,0.0003589038,0.00003130494],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000156017,0.0002397611,0.09635987,0.0001064947,0.0161039,0.000007227648,0.027416,0.1128639,0.0004547691,0.0007938791,0.001189873,0.7443083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002614079,0.0009229982,0.08304034,0.0003786886,0.0307021,0.00003737568,0.01573299,0.8411071,0.009832957,0.01401969,0.001042372,0.0005692785],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9540321,0.001854652,0.04212306,0.0001967577,0.0001023099,0.001403509,0.000003840357,0.0000851717,0.000198564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973297,0.0001330064,0.002005165,0.00000773105,0.0000709334,0.000330443,0.00004388456,0.00001244555,0.00006666286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.743739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3003225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04193317327046068,"score_gpt":0.3481107503424557,"score_spread":0.306177577071995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}