{"id":"W1978998201","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.006","title":"Investigating the accuracy of Bayesian techniques for before–after safety studies: The case of a “no treatment” evaluation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accident Analysis & Prevention","topic":"Traffic and Road Safety","field":"Engineering","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Bayes' theorem; Bayesian probability; Observational study; Collision; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Stability (learning theory); Selection (genetic algorithm); Data mining; Poison control; Outcome (game theory); Statistics; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2820112,0.002389623,0.003012562,0.003369268,0.001719324,0.004215314,0.004350547,0.007711492,0.003139941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6874595,0.001478293,0.00379623,0.001887371,0.005105841,0.008852069,0.003205454,0.006359631,0.0004608742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002187091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004238865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01149822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008459539,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7930463,0.1865575,0.004870687,0.007069281,0.007053445,0.001402831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.08122328,0.8881849,0.008385915,0.01425463,0.00728813,0.0006630816],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0139189,0.001243812,0.1042964,0.00341632,0.01522831,0.0007085821,0.004139643,0.4619853,0.002371917,0.1091666,0.005904053,0.2776201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008958453,0.003011561,0.02274375,0.001162664,0.004062645,0.0004225528,0.0009903109,0.7718779,0.003420136,0.1857035,0.005443089,0.0002660767],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2934157,0.008803644,0.6753572,0.007886325,0.0007401325,0.0006130015,0.0007745998,0.0004831478,0.01192628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9082207,0.0009251347,0.08767516,0.0007920859,0.0002756691,0.0001600084,0.0003559615,0.0001499858,0.001445312],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7179887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.885408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04193317327046068,"score_gpt":0.3481107503424557,"score_spread":0.306177577071995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}