{"id":"W1979004417","doi":"10.1142/s0219198900000081","title":"EVOLUTIONARY AND DYNAMIC STABILITY IN SYMMETRIC EVOLUTIONARY GAMES WITH TWO INDEPENDENT DECISIONS","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Game Theory Review","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Stability (learning theory); Stochastic game; Nash equilibrium; Statement (logic); Competition (biology); Evolutionarily stable strategy; Risk dominance; Best response; Epsilon-equilibrium; Mathematics; Economics; Game theory; Computer science; Ecology; Biology; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002145555,0.000919417,0.0008865877,0.001009162,0.0008214086,0.00206908,0.001259199,0.001364353,0.003044216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008298958,0.000400545,0.001033663,0.0009350753,0.002525612,0.002654983,0.001864797,0.001388779,0.0004107164],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001998637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001332402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00319182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001516717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986564,0.0005944389,0.00005661008,0.0002114183,0.0002761062,0.0002049635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967132,0.002129021,0.0004994444,0.0001291957,0.0003527325,0.0001765129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005309063,0.00003320572,0.0006675376,0.00006509876,0.00005320046,0.0001954501,0.0002784286,0.2517362,0.001102029,0.7365888,0.0006583781,0.008568549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002290548,0.00005331156,0.0003512461,0.00002786566,0.00001960024,0.0001259427,0.00009775226,0.61164,0.0002795836,0.3858179,0.001534294,0.00002950429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1885651,0.001423842,0.750813,0.001612519,0.000113394,0.0001188132,0.0001783265,0.00009514192,0.05707981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9597088,0.0008689942,0.03014546,0.00009879874,0.00006544693,0.0001776275,0.000112039,0.00002516187,0.008797743],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00319182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01450115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05656978910844371,"score_gpt":0.37635403092585,"score_spread":0.3197842418174063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}