{"id":"W1979090354","doi":"10.1115/omae2002-28220","title":"On the Analysis of Crack Interactions Using Weight Function Method","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Weight function; Materials science; Stress intensity factor; Stress (linguistics); Structural engineering; Range (aeronautics); Function (biology); Composite material; Stress concentration; Mechanics; Fracture mechanics; Mathematical analysis; Mathematics; Engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008826307,0.001166657,0.0008139241,0.001804731,0.0004948048,0.0006877049,0.0009285432,0.0007427177,0.003275786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002181628,0.0004199917,0.0008932494,0.001104761,0.0006384964,0.001753663,0.0006221739,0.001031052,0.0009274437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004516375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005244721,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002603184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001822917,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994169,0.0001243776,0.00001735474,0.00007663422,0.0003091719,0.00005545103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991544,0.0004474099,0.00006710666,0.00008967138,0.0002149927,0.00002638758],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001533631,0.0001191656,0.001255591,0.0003426502,0.0001243212,0.0002852688,0.0001834902,0.4239986,0.1002728,0.1595217,0.001683268,0.3120599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003441823,0.00001941347,0.0003010291,0.000007913238,0.000008461181,0.00005045721,0.000007934335,0.9839854,0.00447088,0.009698225,0.001433456,0.00001345291],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005360677,0.0001256092,0.9935606,0.00001058421,0.000009528228,0.00001949305,0.00001327179,0.0001156155,0.0007846337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2322605,0.001133084,0.7568635,0.0000487637,0.00008270308,0.0002670464,0.0001892345,0.0005558804,0.00859926],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003275786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01095855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03913755515583685,"score_gpt":0.2590781713750864,"score_spread":0.2199406162192495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}