{"id":"W1979154230","doi":"10.1139/p09-028","title":"Analysis of the complex effective permittivity of a heterogeneous sample by the finite-difference time-domain method","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physics","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Permittivity; Finite-difference time-domain method; Reflectometry; Lossy compression; Physics; Binary number; Relative permittivity; Series (stratigraphy); Conductivity; Time domain; Mathematical analysis; Lossless compression; Function (biology); Statistical physics; Optics; Algorithm; Mathematics; Dielectric; Quantum mechanics; Statistics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003036263,0.00009726491,0.0003501828,0.00007563192,0.00005348288,0.000009894902,0.0002441487,0.00003348019,0.00005955959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019955,0.00006318491,0.000260176,0.0007599843,0.00007309159,0.00002175663,0.000004675713,0.0001913295,3.358844e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006134279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007796873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005061723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003370527,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990534,0.0003376159,0.000253786,0.00005966454,0.0001404033,0.0001551632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981644,0.001260031,0.0001603925,0.0001846683,0.0001039238,0.0001265881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000229192,0.00005460106,0.004076781,0.00002028705,0.001191365,0.000003671136,0.001687599,0.5076666,0.1479985,0.0004888853,0.0003886883,0.3364001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006216269,0.0007304202,0.2226219,0.0000484999,0.001201712,0.00001653205,0.00006229398,0.6905434,0.06796907,0.01498898,0.0008911224,0.0003045244],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6517841,0.0002515545,0.3473248,0.0001602517,0.00005570866,0.0001210983,0.0001017271,0.000004869318,0.0001959104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939852,0.000002258059,0.005855925,0.0001079803,0.00002899939,6.97768e-7,0.000002103484,0.00000724481,0.000009547569],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3422012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2576606,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01345945816469259,"score_gpt":0.2625515477251685,"score_spread":0.2490920895604759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}