{"id":"W1979238699","doi":"10.1088/1742-6596/151/1/012037","title":"A good practice guide for safe work with nanoparticles: The Quebec approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Physics Conference Series","topic":"Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"NanoQuébec (Canada); Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail","funders":"","keywords":"Risk analysis (engineering); Context (archaeology); Risk management; Work (physics); Hazard; Occupational safety and health; Risk assessment; Legislation; Identification (biology); Business; Control (management); Computer science; Engineering; Medicine; Computer security; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009107976,0.001811548,0.001067054,0.005254209,0.005003981,0.005421683,0.006721174,0.006759336,0.04143471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01954987,0.0008555546,0.001058954,0.00480307,0.002975391,0.003313846,0.003432469,0.005286936,0.02436726],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02256542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08774158,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5239729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7307239,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9912552,0.002346088,0.000528719,0.0004268935,0.004799974,0.0006432012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839516,0.00274066,0.0005023333,0.0006075558,0.01062736,0.001570409],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000301929,0.00030448,0.001307874,0.0007530628,0.00001339272,0.0006834613,0.001430847,0.001395828,0.0008176201,0.03182399,0.6490032,0.312436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001713916,0.00005575345,0.001733003,0.001281387,0.00001038391,0.0003629803,0.001408739,0.001127266,0.0002174892,0.006041133,0.9876935,0.00005117834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.003710189,0.02111885,0.2828745,0.1506443,0.006055794,0.009439925,0.005755399,0.007313098,0.5130879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02727391,0.03020437,0.5623691,0.0344376,0.0006867803,0.008173826,0.002868501,0.001223799,0.3327621],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4760271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9576611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02516454160178107,"score_gpt":0.2679127600814963,"score_spread":0.2427482184797152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}