{"id":"W1979248804","doi":"10.1002/bdm.626","title":"How do we evaluate future gambles? Experimental evidence on path dependency in risky intertemporal choice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Management and Science University; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Lottery; Discounting; Econometrics; Path (computing); Economics; Time preference; Intertemporal choice; Choice set; Prospect theory; Expected utility hypothesis; Value (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01254563,0.0004166404,0.0005764376,0.000421272,0.0003419291,0.001335656,0.0008558191,0.001228348,0.004574116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08895485,0.0007563625,0.0003953682,0.0003647168,0.001358954,0.002748388,0.001184037,0.002280403,0.0004519443],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000430386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003460155,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004563907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003163769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993847,0.004001402,0.0003677596,0.0006618702,0.0009883873,0.0001335203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8103217,0.1608845,0.01351092,0.01232421,0.001508213,0.001450449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.04624234,0.02692451,0.2306955,0.002310904,0.001376269,0.001404134,0.01799158,0.05178228,0.2629173,0.1004017,0.003136285,0.2548172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004529784,0.02616714,0.5494925,0.0004380896,0.0006659555,0.00167085,0.001587666,0.1614287,0.09320212,0.1496783,0.01050835,0.0006305248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919245,0.0001093147,0.003829486,0.0001362628,0.00001054533,0.00008057706,0.00004197229,0.00001879589,0.003848522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934087,0.0001383887,0.005580625,0.00009930477,0.000009954147,0.0001150406,0.00005794025,0.00001933517,0.0005706653],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01254563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06634843,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2626441372739362,"score_gpt":0.4735475796671665,"score_spread":0.2109034423932304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}