{"id":"W1979344163","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.008","title":"Ecosystem service value assessment for constructed wetlands: A case study in Hangzhou, China","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Wetland; Ecosystem services; China; Total economic value; Contingent valuation; Value (mathematics); Valuation (finance); Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Resource (disambiguation); Willingness to pay; Natural resource economics; Geography; Economics; Ecology; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001272675,0.000430492,0.0003576062,0.001829806,0.00132683,0.001165219,0.0008502813,0.0009552198,0.0008265388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002167383,0.0001721969,0.0004850867,0.002475564,0.001043284,0.0008285089,0.000750937,0.0003192091,0.00004223473],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006742687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002771369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2054144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3044582,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993764,0.0002591421,0.0000279512,0.00005972626,0.0001379435,0.0001388717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988065,0.0005994347,0.0001288102,0.00008353317,0.0002335289,0.0001481848],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008491733,0.0009819373,0.7116311,0.0002504655,0.0003675727,0.02281708,0.00618403,0.1586354,0.007559226,0.01906405,0.002513515,0.06914652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001381264,0.0005236916,0.5722641,0.00006826104,0.0002630748,0.001323275,0.01872938,0.3927041,0.003786542,0.006901433,0.003183137,0.0001148535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983398,0.00003291063,0.0005868754,0.00007485886,0.000001632631,0.00002093061,0.00005706907,0.000006356259,0.0008795112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991209,0.00002646424,0.0004911097,0.000003628211,0.000001252931,0.000003845814,0.00004077462,0.00000142023,0.00031048],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2054144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4084375,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1050702986970693,"score_gpt":0.2499022652335738,"score_spread":0.1448319665365045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}