{"id":"W1979344163","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.008","title":"Ecosystem service value assessment for constructed wetlands: A case study in Hangzhou, China","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Wetland; Ecosystem services; China; Total economic value; Contingent valuation; Value (mathematics); Valuation (finance); Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Resource (disambiguation); Willingness to pay; Natural resource economics; Geography; Economics; Ecology; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009407962,0.000263571,0.0007470641,0.0001846433,0.0002560118,0.00004998223,0.0002371979,0.0002041152,0.0007252907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004961379,0.0003026114,0.000137838,0.0001205827,0.00004360185,0.0002884195,0.0001190545,0.0001966633,0.0003108091],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008637511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005261598,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005625517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004282461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975674,0.0000513353,0.001199358,0.000738267,0.00001810166,0.0004255087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988686,0.0001753551,0.0004702459,0.0003454697,0.00001199617,0.0001283242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002516427,0.0007712377,0.9720198,0.00002072266,0.00007031694,0.0001511515,0.0006928672,0.0098641,0.000001284122,0.01613495,0.00008351958,0.0001649025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003966973,0.0004982118,0.8963172,0.000004621214,0.00001198885,0.0005922489,0.001719733,0.08887929,0.000003889642,0.006581586,0.0009684597,0.0004558155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925913,0.00004335679,0.0005180388,0.0003370341,0.0004808744,0.001591574,0.0002682093,0.00004732754,0.004122339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963735,0.00008862335,0.002430516,0.0003791114,0.0001055843,0.0004416546,0.0000579123,0.00003230936,0.00009082511],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0790152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1050702986970693,"score_gpt":0.2499022652335738,"score_spread":0.1448319665365045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}