{"id":"W1979529125","doi":"10.1016/j.jconhyd.2009.05.007","title":"Multi-stage optimal design for groundwater remediation: A hybrid bi-level programming approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Contaminant Hydrology","topic":"Groundwater flow and contamination studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental remediation; Groundwater remediation; Groundwater; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Aquifer; Stage (stratigraphy); Process (computing); Nonlinear programming; Environmental science; Nonlinear system; Engineering; Mathematics; Geology; Contamination","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001153857,0.0002164711,0.0004424682,0.0001172688,0.000204739,0.00005254191,0.0003188902,0.00008925526,0.00006517805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008472567,0.0001638713,0.0001746944,0.0001118601,0.0001420619,0.0004070046,0.00005913201,0.0001906521,0.00002258447],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001524252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002683932,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001452971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001318453,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981685,0.0001398641,0.0006578874,0.0002647212,0.0003155857,0.0004534678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990389,0.0001216822,0.0004860693,0.0001536512,0.00008606718,0.0001136082],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002988492,0.004357108,0.0227304,0.00008456601,0.0005929523,0.0007130887,0.009854081,0.0169035,0.08604222,0.000678568,0.006474982,0.8485801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02628261,0.02293719,0.2166487,0.00009705665,0.0008461821,0.004045248,0.002129639,0.2021169,0.02657839,0.0007728795,0.4952262,0.002318925],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2876188,0.0001012154,0.7109984,0.0005859886,0.0002161535,0.0003827832,0.000002770232,0.00001379652,0.00008010225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.876422,0.00002061597,0.1202004,0.0003868789,0.0001508667,0.00003511627,0.000005702755,0.00001329531,0.002765106],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8462611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6682476,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05802819711107216,"score_gpt":0.2775370820224173,"score_spread":0.2195088849113452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}