{"id":"W1979529125","doi":"10.1016/j.jconhyd.2009.05.007","title":"Multi-stage optimal design for groundwater remediation: A hybrid bi-level programming approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Contaminant Hydrology","topic":"Groundwater flow and contamination studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental remediation; Groundwater remediation; Groundwater; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Aquifer; Stage (stratigraphy); Process (computing); Nonlinear programming; Environmental science; Nonlinear system; Engineering; Mathematics; Geology; Contamination","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003245075,0.001886796,0.00320424,0.00147303,0.0009119318,0.002506548,0.002888283,0.003632276,0.005652377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004008524,0.00281035,0.00286737,0.001425212,0.001141015,0.001724009,0.002151615,0.002332844,0.0006058251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001539332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002503781,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01272353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01056066,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984307,0.00081001,0.00006460408,0.0001877677,0.0002779537,0.0002289512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973273,0.001974867,0.0001612075,0.00007638084,0.0003453262,0.0001147862],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003050399,0.00003048201,0.00006425376,0.00002652799,0.00002342298,0.00001420532,0.00001159747,0.9955635,0.0002257711,0.0009551917,0.00008618858,0.002968318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006193634,0.00001860918,0.00001475872,0.000002110993,0.000004683568,0.000001546001,0.000002595328,0.9994125,0.00006520055,0.0004231353,0.00004581708,0.000002772682],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01319617,0.0001851259,0.9831337,0.0001788374,0.00004032933,0.00009949881,0.00006452259,0.0001967703,0.002905087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5709174,0.0002898787,0.4192478,0.0002820758,0.00007785614,0.001165655,0.0002061829,0.0002077223,0.007605514],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01272353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02529895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05802819711107216,"score_gpt":0.2775370820224173,"score_spread":0.2195088849113452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}