{"id":"W1979542798","doi":"10.1016/j.proenv.2010.10.217","title":"Environmental risk management with the aid of city emergency response system in Nanning City","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Procedia Environmental Sciences","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China; Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada","keywords":"Emergency response; Environmental planning; Emergency management; Business; Environmental resource management; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental science; Medical emergency; Medicine; Economic growth; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002698062,0.0001678785,0.0001476858,0.0001138251,0.0009688211,0.00005504772,0.0009181405,0.00005591098,0.0004274558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002771683,0.0001099937,0.000054234,0.0004381096,0.002422117,0.000438308,0.000264838,0.0002144843,0.00002981389],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001066395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002731545,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003326364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001103126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975144,0.0002172709,0.0002745017,0.0004616478,0.001062515,0.0004697166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993386,0.00009076248,0.000243989,0.0002227269,0.000002369013,0.0001015216],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001277829,0.0001884179,0.9767209,0.00002178364,0.00001516194,0.000008694233,0.01223795,0.00007828014,0.002147984,0.001755513,0.00009521007,0.006602312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003894531,0.0001582825,0.8771606,0.00003487335,0.00003602465,0.000002235997,0.1104858,0.0001436345,0.0005433535,0.0002217309,0.01054074,0.0002832469],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9709445,0.0001026803,0.00004412928,0.0002604799,0.0002424115,0.0005771457,0.00001109732,0.00002808812,0.02778945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979794,0.0002715997,0.0005112002,0.00001922614,0.00004961792,0.00005724176,9.211275e-7,0.000006991858,0.001103804],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09956033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8924392,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008217852908477413,"score_gpt":0.2352005959575595,"score_spread":0.2269827430490821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}