{"id":"W1979542798","doi":"10.1016/j.proenv.2010.10.217","title":"Environmental risk management with the aid of city emergency response system in Nanning City","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Procedia Environmental Sciences","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China; Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada","keywords":"Emergency response; Environmental planning; Emergency management; Business; Environmental resource management; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental science; Medical emergency; Medicine; Economic growth; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009872561,0.0003633189,0.0002248173,0.0005748434,0.0006051248,0.0006950738,0.0005134622,0.0004340337,0.0009572046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001383358,0.0002013594,0.0002494446,0.0004707149,0.0002734843,0.0006588107,0.000976022,0.0002527726,0.0001392634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001053224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001315702,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01620727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0207769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994466,0.000271421,0.00002682575,0.00006737422,0.0001182211,0.00006967459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995195,0.0001204878,0.00009042615,0.00005296574,0.0001705135,0.0000461359],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007489493,0.0005320612,0.1961183,0.0002357828,0.0001557954,0.002407764,0.005183459,0.4774193,0.01762503,0.004801286,0.003865551,0.2909068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007302211,0.0004043056,0.1486263,0.0000472615,0.000124789,0.0002883004,0.005603295,0.8208408,0.01388004,0.003271017,0.006739333,0.0001015978],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9720709,0.00006297276,0.02232303,0.0003111092,0.000008550376,0.0001445202,0.0001075931,0.000248405,0.004722973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867595,0.00005091303,0.01117324,0.00001236338,0.000003919942,0.00004829763,0.0001026356,0.0000104888,0.001838666],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01620727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03222591,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008217852908477413,"score_gpt":0.2352005959575595,"score_spread":0.2269827430490821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}