{"id":"W1979782612","doi":"10.1007/s10902-013-9465-4","title":"Keep Up with the Joneses or Keep on as Their Neighbours: Life Satisfaction and Income in Canadian Urban Neighbourhoods","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Happiness Studies","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Keeping up with the Joneses; Life satisfaction; Externality; Locality; Demographic economics; Consumption (sociology); Economics; Scale (ratio); Marital status; Socioeconomics; Subjective well-being; Geography; Happiness; Psychology; Demography; Social psychology; Sociology; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004814558,0.0002676804,0.0005066254,0.0003498814,0.0002859519,0.00008527392,0.0001596245,0.00012726,0.0006999499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003026465,0.0001250474,0.00006573377,0.0003702012,0.0002209244,0.0002369543,0.0000271952,0.0005603532,0.00006684447],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001411507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001077042,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06300136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07839876,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983298,0.0002747294,0.0004671857,0.000241361,0.0002421747,0.0004447799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983442,0.0005451047,0.0003903155,0.0002251572,0.0002292295,0.0002660296],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001279487,0.0001451206,0.9038514,0.00004584889,0.001245557,0.0001703485,0.01631946,0.0001073235,0.00008884433,0.005993217,0.01769653,0.05305687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001274428,0.001074855,0.9753014,0.0001605404,0.00003923749,0.0002745306,0.01460431,0.00001087535,0.000007036122,0.003007618,0.004051895,0.0001932675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9668149,0.002035247,0.00001736714,0.01410355,0.001360449,0.0002785523,0.000003931296,0.00001878773,0.01536724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962468,0.0007224219,0.00002212055,0.001760842,0.0004910924,0.0000438726,4.828007e-7,0.00002144129,0.0006909141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07145002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9432382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03580275617306831,"score_gpt":0.3224614659655018,"score_spread":0.2866587097924335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}