{"id":"W1979840387","doi":"10.2134/jeq2002.1256","title":"An Assessment of Stream Water Quality of the Rio San Juan, Nuevo Leon, Mexico, 1995–1996","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Quality","topic":"Water Quality and Pollution Assessment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología; National Water Commission","keywords":"Environmental science; Water quality; Hydrology (agriculture); Fecal coliform; Pollution; Water pollution; Sampling (signal processing); Contamination; Sulfate; Environmental engineering; Environmental chemistry; Geology; Chemistry; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00351387,0.0002894607,0.0006532485,0.00005226444,0.0001814945,0.00002555447,0.0008245373,0.000142552,0.01069569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002963652,0.0001812402,0.0004689146,0.0001261746,0.000814649,0.0005839553,0.0003073741,0.0004416395,0.00005215822],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005710738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001653626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007065287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001656511,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937627,0.001788673,0.002056024,0.0003209114,0.001682282,0.0003894083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972001,0.000107544,0.001608188,0.0008239875,0.00001255948,0.0002476572],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006847441,0.003025945,0.6060035,0.00004773874,0.0001043315,0.000003912915,0.00200312,0.00160508,0.3839082,0.0003626987,0.0006821608,0.002184874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009682426,0.000381833,0.9212881,0.00002708204,0.00005468895,0.00001776954,0.0007527483,0.0001550943,0.07217466,0.0004886908,0.003448656,0.0002423854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958085,0.00005963368,0.0003768147,0.0007230988,0.0002827893,0.000232031,0.0002047525,0.000007698643,0.002304699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977481,0.00006818298,0.001357833,0.0003204046,0.00006729757,0.000003446912,0.00001003555,0.00001805786,0.0004066324],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3152846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9902087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04716777311929801,"score_gpt":0.3434868529261726,"score_spread":0.2963190798068747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}