{"id":"W1979939621","doi":"10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01013.x","title":"Accounting Conservatism and the Temporal Trends in Current Earnings’ Ability to Predict Future Cash Flows versus Future Earnings: Evidence on the Trade‐off between Relevance and Reliability*","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Relevance (law); Accounting; Citation; Audit; Conservatism; Cash flow; Chen; Actuarial science; Economics; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02022854,0.0006499166,0.0007643585,0.000717404,0.001852882,0.001822892,0.001674739,0.0003015437,0.0001199153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05308947,0.0004549686,0.0001561517,0.002902398,0.001139624,0.002998697,0.001885838,0.00531595,0.00006978882],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001307701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001662007,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001683654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008097263,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933994,0.0005772228,0.001092922,0.001673166,0.00202139,0.00123588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865335,0.006736371,0.004421035,0.001613578,0.0005840838,0.0001114628],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009505388,0.00005568968,0.8662694,0.0003951426,0.00002461548,0.00001607598,0.001073388,0.00002343488,0.0001258758,0.002329571,0.01608468,0.1126516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001726819,0.00005223564,0.6230627,0.0005926386,0.00002262392,0.000001593724,0.001148897,0.001079939,0.00000640113,0.0003807861,0.3715298,0.0003955232],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.916047,0.001440786,0.00007932272,0.07716803,0.001267851,0.00179124,0.00001468511,0.0001983756,0.001992743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919799,0.0002239907,0.0001278854,0.0009677708,0.006077834,0.0002703571,0.00003047842,0.0000977875,0.000223998],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3554451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04455800312486399,"score_gpt":0.3114380335667015,"score_spread":0.2668800304418375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}