{"id":"W1979980829","doi":"10.1002/int.20476","title":"Alternative approach for learning and improving the MCDA method PROAFTN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Intelligent Systems","topic":"Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; National Research Council Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Preprocessor; Data pre-processing; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Data mining; Construct (python library); Measure (data warehouse); Mathematics; Mathematical optimization","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004986075,0.000707034,0.001146733,0.002658159,0.000653695,0.001365959,0.0022999,0.001108937,0.004225724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01612538,0.0004507339,0.0009389485,0.0022339,0.0008933338,0.002029555,0.001779354,0.00184393,0.0008285788],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000970361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001446453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002885694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004390156,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961001,0.00172132,0.0002561288,0.0006163823,0.001192142,0.000113947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934914,0.003551706,0.0003252156,0.0007622939,0.001769561,0.00009986759],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002160159,0.0002007623,0.002839758,0.0004699568,0.0001455966,0.00009394089,0.0004679161,0.2327269,0.004797949,0.07580969,0.002859566,0.6793719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003510254,0.00006867103,0.0004270484,0.00004171946,0.00001871987,0.00009403939,0.00006110536,0.9658971,0.00249608,0.02504505,0.005790365,0.0000249375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002909425,0.00008301497,0.9960858,0.00007188671,0.00002251217,0.00003917653,0.0000228727,0.0001052121,0.0006601661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07352471,0.00009083677,0.9253806,0.00007335191,0.00002966097,0.0001255114,0.0000974397,0.00003056068,0.0006473614],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004986075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02636921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07620748980444986,"score_gpt":0.3218283083797058,"score_spread":0.245620818575256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}