{"id":"W1980058092","doi":"10.1016/j.ijscr.2011.02.013","title":"Intrapancreatic accessory spleen: A case report and review of the literature","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Surgery Case Reports","topic":"Abdominal Trauma and Injuries","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Saskatoon City Hospital; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Accessory spleen; Pancreas; Lesion; Distal pancreatectomy; Spleen; Radiology; Splenectomy; Pathology; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003707498,0.001821252,0.001314582,0.004904787,0.001001078,0.001796256,0.001799919,0.003757735,0.003125844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002182893,0.0006702403,0.0006363134,0.003742402,0.001163844,0.002356237,0.00115996,0.001434044,0.002113394],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004764287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006453798,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005907138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009123868,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994149,0.00005800132,0.0001540058,0.0001165132,0.000122812,0.000133655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982589,0.0004804619,0.0006146766,0.0001134998,0.000162778,0.000369755],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003209662,0.00008302697,0.008281694,0.0004856965,0.00003488238,0.9760129,0.000201487,0.00009509752,0.0008608112,0.0001509242,0.001830246,0.01193117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006999439,0.0000345619,0.003139436,0.00007474818,0.00002478906,0.9929042,0.0001796815,0.00007306052,0.0001384471,0.00009664004,0.003318101,0.00000937304],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":"case_report","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5666381,0.3992904,0.005805157,0.003911415,0.003330913,0.0002590449,0.0004734647,0.0005599075,0.01973167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8309991,0.1515746,0.003644043,0.001647719,0.007671856,0.00008888567,0.0004758073,0.00005653577,0.003841408],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004904787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01045698,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05038309442314609,"score_gpt":0.3216742842984323,"score_spread":0.2712911898752862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}