{"id":"W1980086873","doi":"10.1016/j.aquatox.2009.04.011","title":"Inhibition of egg production in zebrafish by fluoxetine and municipal effluents: A mechanistic evaluation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquatic Toxicology","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":179,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Zebrafish; Effluent; Fluoxetine; Production (economics); Environmental chemistry; Biology; Chemistry; Environmental science; Environmental engineering; Biochemistry; Gene; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004926373,0.000096266,0.0001464161,0.00003478305,0.00003253848,0.000004999149,0.00005060568,0.00006783783,0.0006514735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000220965,0.0000899447,0.00001400983,0.0001390589,0.000162376,0.0001388894,0.0000457614,0.00009045357,0.00006138231],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000123659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004407867,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007957959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006505704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998951,0.0001486915,0.0002454151,0.0002373047,0.0002200389,0.0001975227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996984,0.00004273502,0.00007976576,0.0001045204,0.000002183739,0.00007237413],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003219568,0.0004730288,0.003362122,0.000007354432,0.00000330136,0.000002318827,0.0002529043,0.0001923118,0.9750075,0.00005230398,0.0002278863,0.0203868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003056396,0.001632512,0.2417901,0.00009010912,0.0001205073,0.00004374443,0.0002352978,0.04328446,0.6885685,0.02051568,0.0002814951,0.0003811916],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973306,0.00005427467,0.00006716676,0.001113642,0.00005603907,0.000373903,0.000002251181,0.00000955644,0.0009925447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990202,0.00002714933,0.0002401985,0.0006168116,0.00001134015,0.000005941579,0.00001613605,0.000004544577,0.00005772978],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2864389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7133179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02281321049390486,"score_gpt":0.2981432711761433,"score_spread":0.2753300606822384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}