{"id":"W1980093279","doi":"10.1002/job.154","title":"The effects of quality improvement practices on team effectiveness: a mediational model","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","topic":"Quality and Supply Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Work & Health; McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Structural equation modeling; Team effectiveness; Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Quality management; Team composition; Organizational performance; Health care; Perception; Applied psychology; Knowledge management; Social psychology; Business; Marketing; Computer science; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01757856,0.001720255,0.001331932,0.002128117,0.001762031,0.004669209,0.003056548,0.002451654,0.01286696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08353774,0.001290509,0.002339698,0.001562955,0.003298709,0.004780501,0.00531127,0.003862101,0.0009456375],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002016144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004188112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007359302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00259719,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9727588,0.02211956,0.0005592599,0.001256162,0.001796336,0.001509846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8515798,0.1299117,0.007868718,0.00339546,0.004507398,0.002736883],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005156745,0.01447203,0.5967122,0.002710162,0.0125692,0.002239594,0.03761703,0.03689905,0.003349466,0.167244,0.006949504,0.1140812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00329973,0.009352473,0.3154183,0.004373754,0.01188263,0.001796521,0.02087079,0.3682916,0.003932227,0.249686,0.01057703,0.0005188667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9391995,0.001659316,0.02643524,0.007666235,0.0002226094,0.0007187979,0.0005050673,0.0001904079,0.02340286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936325,0.0004995647,0.004221329,0.0002078951,0.00005020312,0.0004152313,0.00008332686,0.00001683603,0.0008731923],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01757856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09296542,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02699956515544347,"score_gpt":0.2865687479103862,"score_spread":0.2595691827549427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}