{"id":"W1980100678","doi":"10.1007/s10666-011-9285-z","title":"Spending Environmental Expenditure More Effectively: A Case Study from Brisbane, Australia","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Modeling & Assessment","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Metaheuristic; Portfolio; Budget constraint; Process (computing); Selection (genetic algorithm); Constraint (computer-aided design); Computer science; Operations research; Environmental economics; Business; Economics; Engineering; Microeconomics; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001325148,0.0003056151,0.0003163898,0.0006653648,0.004855532,0.001713853,0.0008505058,0.001307608,0.00272002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003832208,0.0002753266,0.0003596783,0.001341283,0.001400804,0.0009576762,0.001758395,0.001399502,0.0002637317],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00665528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005326144,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4737907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6907839,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989513,0.0004728534,0.00002540276,0.00006841631,0.0001316271,0.000350412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980835,0.0007053805,0.0001897515,0.00008315219,0.0003449739,0.0005932956],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001702948,0.007721303,0.3571424,0.001135706,0.0005482779,0.05425207,0.2737173,0.02168806,0.007658694,0.04072392,0.03447539,0.199234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003537402,0.002004465,0.5164175,0.0004477964,0.0002754944,0.006491651,0.3623791,0.01918852,0.002468356,0.00462277,0.0851628,0.0001877392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892925,0.00009235193,0.0002178047,0.001103674,0.000006057081,0.00003698454,0.00003747518,0.000006507019,0.009206702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926158,0.0002706593,0.000701708,0.0002273418,0.000005668224,0.00002458982,0.00004189904,0.00001363421,0.006098688],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4737907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.942066,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03289809162251035,"score_gpt":0.2469940445934762,"score_spread":0.2140959529709659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}