{"id":"W1980100678","doi":"10.1007/s10666-011-9285-z","title":"Spending Environmental Expenditure More Effectively: A Case Study from Brisbane, Australia","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Modeling & Assessment","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Metaheuristic; Portfolio; Budget constraint; Process (computing); Selection (genetic algorithm); Constraint (computer-aided design); Computer science; Operations research; Environmental economics; Business; Economics; Engineering; Microeconomics; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001305886,0.0004318333,0.0002805937,0.0001196264,0.0001804026,0.00007443692,0.0002250622,0.0001002009,0.001311499],"category_scores_gemma":[5.911498e-7,0.0004503171,0.0001036924,0.00004693814,0.00004124353,0.0003817234,0.0001958205,0.0003118337,0.0001281702],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005010651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001717861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005906139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002228051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982086,0.00007026308,0.0003787235,0.0005319382,0.0003998272,0.0004106791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993749,0.00001443351,0.00006253268,0.0004011468,8.421011e-7,0.0001461083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003220948,0.001145064,0.2179693,0.00002262579,0.0004994445,0.003060526,0.01233539,0.7591753,0.003591893,0.000004906638,0.00006787149,0.002095444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001516283,0.0002237899,0.05130847,0.00002689335,0.0002537128,0.00009906563,0.01783257,0.9268287,0.001017116,0.0000504314,0.00007827317,0.0007647254],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9574162,0.00007458188,0.04054225,0.000002439297,0.0002977893,0.0008783921,0.00005581313,0.0002098185,0.0005227132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945146,0.00002890801,0.004779418,0.00001164324,0.0001232114,0.0001147316,0.0001985048,0.00009569922,0.0001332921],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1676534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03289809162251035,"score_gpt":0.2469940445934762,"score_spread":0.2140959529709659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}