{"id":"W1980279809","doi":"10.1115/pvp2009-77863","title":"Shakedown/Ratcheting Boundary Determination Using Iterative Linear Elastic Schemes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Volume 1: Codes and Standards","topic":"High Temperature Alloys and Creep","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Atomic Energy (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Shakedown; Ratchet; Boundary (topology); Feature (linguistics); Boundary value problem; Computer science; Boundary element method; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Finite element method; Applied mathematics; Structural engineering; Mathematical analysis; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007403754,0.0006226882,0.0006345172,0.0007138657,0.0005397453,0.0008314811,0.001495716,0.001033991,0.003307329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002006039,0.0004978642,0.0005637954,0.0002994096,0.0008693583,0.001037297,0.001442714,0.0009787113,0.0008913756],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004747965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001182425,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001939247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002654388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996355,0.00006656955,0.0000258579,0.00006418578,0.0001818253,0.00002610795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991404,0.0003513117,0.0001299102,0.0001584866,0.0001884253,0.00003136905],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001301005,0.0000827726,0.001323244,0.0002897998,0.00003866624,0.0001342558,0.0004052331,0.6016784,0.04867426,0.0556476,0.001701799,0.2898938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006590838,0.00002018898,0.0000759461,0.0000124822,0.000003484374,0.00003835775,0.00001567361,0.9899746,0.00502213,0.002598444,0.002220759,0.00001136941],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004215442,0.00004613346,0.9939469,0.00002492317,0.00001394114,0.00002536122,0.0000076584,0.0002524363,0.001467193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1337703,0.00008412582,0.8624551,0.0000333625,0.0000116568,0.0001023793,0.00005773519,0.0001957692,0.003289611],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003307329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01106417,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007218991042783482,"score_gpt":0.2478949800784148,"score_spread":0.2406759890356313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}