{"id":"W1980312137","doi":"10.1007/s00267-013-0075-z","title":"Capacity for Watershed Cumulative Effects Assessment and Management: Lessons from the Lower Fraser River Basin, Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Watershed; Cumulative effects; Watershed management; Environmental resource management; Forest management; Corporate governance; Structural basin; Scale (ratio); Environmental science; Geography; Environmental planning; Business; Ecology; Computer science; Geology; Agroforestry; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004227555,0.0006438323,0.0005876749,0.002841779,0.004619581,0.005824395,0.003062865,0.001085025,0.003965524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01273954,0.0003180023,0.0005439477,0.003968992,0.003429627,0.002796804,0.002768808,0.001541367,0.0002199664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08738569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1368346,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971312,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978243,0.000398577,0.00004490782,0.0001267216,0.000925744,0.0006797003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992646,0.001897572,0.0002060733,0.0002399715,0.004037604,0.0009728482],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001422418,0.0002329647,0.1346383,0.0004573885,0.0002849575,0.0005111953,0.005839871,0.1951572,0.0006959367,0.1999644,0.09047452,0.371601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001275792,0.0001671243,0.1750747,0.001864179,0.0004034619,0.0002835349,0.03629383,0.2549885,0.002366503,0.2922106,0.2357995,0.0004204833],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5091114,0.01554858,0.05424058,0.1172724,0.0002925852,0.0006039476,0.004883923,0.0007411158,0.2973055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9652624,0.004153708,0.01439752,0.0008030355,0.0000444319,0.00007804939,0.0005640684,0.00009998751,0.01459673],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08738569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6340306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009911240593798611,"score_gpt":0.2346307401015326,"score_spread":0.224719499507734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}