{"id":"W1980372699","doi":"10.1109/tpwrs.2002.800871","title":"Determination of the optimum routine test and self-checking intervals in protective relaying using a reliability model","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Power Systems","topic":"Power System Reliability and Maintenance","field":"Engineering","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Dependability; Relay; Reliability (semiconductor); Protective relay; Computer science; Markov model; Markov chain; Markov process; Engineering; Power (physics); Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005558044,0.0001906095,0.0003018502,0.0001319179,0.00009238119,0.00003073337,0.0001457922,0.0001429502,0.000003642733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004262645,0.0001577396,0.00009292953,0.0003199328,0.00005444416,0.0002464361,0.000003125265,0.0003268501,0.000002096532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003685142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001400314,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001289209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003567976,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986359,0.0001161413,0.0005544048,0.0002647379,0.000195471,0.000233321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992164,0.0001485757,0.0001038151,0.0004026339,0.00008420421,0.00004434209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008230009,0.0002209112,0.0003794544,0.0006065204,0.00002064378,0.000001700745,0.005348154,0.9879848,0.005157318,0.00001584039,0.000005847498,0.0002505954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003269628,0.00004813875,0.0001821976,0.0007964926,0.00002076192,0.00002933923,0.0002667392,0.9935253,0.00460637,0.00002407002,0.00001751602,0.0001561456],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2817175,0.0001353769,0.716116,0.00002381225,0.0006611708,0.0008180619,0.00002017946,0.0001192116,0.0003886411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998798,0.00001669041,0.0009858023,0.000005898688,0.000004416482,0.0001040502,7.414083e-8,0.00002890773,0.000056163],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7170805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6432435,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0171299439962037,"score_gpt":0.2177357559578925,"score_spread":0.2006058119616888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}