{"id":"W1980434543","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0112077","title":"Measuring the Bright Side of Being Blue: A New Tool for Assessing Analytical Rumination in Depression","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Rasch model; Cronbach's alpha; Rumination; Clinical psychology; Psychology; Reliability (semiconductor); Intraclass correlation; Psychometrics; Rating scale; Construct validity; Cognition; Developmental psychology; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007319947,0.0001837216,0.000335838,0.0003649562,0.0001328429,0.00006108347,0.0002451853,0.0001438239,0.0001122458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002456291,0.0001392785,0.00008413498,0.0006599762,0.00006668041,0.0002547787,0.00006200664,0.0001997986,0.00002471034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006842297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004475566,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007182149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002015404,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981542,0.0002006462,0.0004279748,0.0004505333,0.0004288569,0.0003377675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997702,0.001343339,0.0002540332,0.0003587012,0.000269377,0.00007255464],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002517854,0.002679035,0.5767149,0.0002040455,0.0003689653,0.000002583947,0.00220625,0.00001652379,0.007135832,0.001460692,0.0005178992,0.4084415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004439618,0.0001922141,0.8998792,0.001491318,0.0006663479,0.000005278428,0.0006972904,0.004225713,0.07562036,0.01025754,0.002053634,0.0004715293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9445307,0.0007453287,0.04511422,0.0003493963,0.0001570875,0.000611174,0.000004537004,0.00005410229,0.008433432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946183,0.000166858,0.003775129,0.00009440309,0.0003242849,0.0001170019,0.00001307033,0.00003837565,0.0008525606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.40797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5679611,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09520378272569058,"score_gpt":0.3343504230958236,"score_spread":0.2391466403701331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}