{"id":"W1980435114","doi":"10.5589/m05-029","title":"Evaluation of RADARSAT-1 images acquired in fine mode for the study of boreal peatlands: a case study in James Bay, Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing","topic":"Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Peat; Forestry; Geography; Synthetic aperture radar; Remote sensing; Cartography; Physical geography; Boreal; Environmental science; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005559503,0.0005448255,0.0003216689,0.001112464,0.0007142639,0.000934788,0.0004911412,0.0004650745,0.0005321309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009870515,0.0002024776,0.0002773899,0.001123856,0.0004724113,0.0002644735,0.0002812017,0.0002130478,0.0001608368],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002712074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002538324,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7002667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8663462,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996544,0.00003195148,0.00001296349,0.00006366089,0.0001446247,0.00009233633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999317,0.0001169911,0.00004657495,0.0000350516,0.0003951082,0.00008923031],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00143384,0.0009017755,0.4431154,0.0007270515,0.0003035641,0.004936172,0.004114915,0.09040771,0.1827711,0.0006495555,0.002191067,0.2684479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000463213,0.0002901555,0.8973687,0.00004423948,0.0001299569,0.0006383837,0.004073701,0.07206719,0.02205489,0.00008913129,0.003140496,0.00005693141],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956791,0.0001392945,0.001866919,0.0000512603,0.000005213239,0.00007739491,0.0004486236,0.0000740898,0.001658203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922783,0.0001869377,0.005508949,0.00002057171,0.000003931564,0.00001578488,0.0006224053,0.00001667792,0.001346412],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2997333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6029971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02389589038185664,"score_gpt":0.2736475079042683,"score_spread":0.2497516175224117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}