{"id":"W1980435114","doi":"10.5589/m05-029","title":"Evaluation of RADARSAT-1 images acquired in fine mode for the study of boreal peatlands: a case study in James Bay, Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing","topic":"Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Peat; Forestry; Geography; Synthetic aperture radar; Remote sensing; Cartography; Physical geography; Boreal; Environmental science; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001788866,0.00009797342,0.0002785737,0.0001547575,0.00007348246,0.00001046095,0.0001272186,0.00003132787,0.00002048156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002217338,0.00007350579,0.00003457529,0.0002055467,0.00005589922,0.00008397183,0.00001706946,0.00009875384,6.163145e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007611362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008984473,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9774126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985622,0.0002271801,0.0005044453,0.0001216751,0.0003489123,0.0002355683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992152,0.0001563381,0.0002631942,0.0001501455,0.00008912088,0.0001259498],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009033157,0.0001156633,0.4028755,0.000005733511,0.00007156195,0.001942357,0.01238625,0.04777945,0.0001107088,1.365905e-7,0.001000857,0.5336214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007025538,0.000900224,0.7157916,0.00006577536,0.000257561,0.001580796,0.03418668,0.2392114,0.0001513664,0.0000560729,0.0005876166,0.0001853904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985743,0.0001222323,0.0001043213,0.0004729183,0.00007647277,0.0005119033,0.000009880158,5.582813e-7,0.0001274849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987374,0.00000369162,0.001169299,0.00003266591,0.00003908831,1.208601e-7,0.000001603556,0.000007544086,0.00000860923],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.533436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2997479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02389589038185664,"score_gpt":0.2736475079042683,"score_spread":0.2497516175224117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}