{"id":"W1980485176","doi":"10.1139/f04-200","title":"Bias in estimating food consumption of fish by stomach-content analysis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Stomach; Statistics; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Food consumption; Portion size; Consumption (sociology); Mathematics; Biology; Fishery; Ecology; Food science; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02148268,0.0008016992,0.001373563,0.001761019,0.0003230984,0.0009664278,0.001026776,0.0007401232,0.0007132565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1004909,0.0006218265,0.001047734,0.001754965,0.0006894213,0.001387013,0.001260242,0.0006620586,0.0003681708],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001052408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005338445,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006240162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004660768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9830967,0.01067923,0.0009229301,0.001132375,0.003902337,0.000266461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9402847,0.04483099,0.004751075,0.005297587,0.004693832,0.0001418979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003384063,0.0002067919,0.4027725,0.002319247,0.003455942,0.0004796981,0.002399544,0.1749224,0.04535388,0.006077114,0.002207249,0.3564215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001921615,0.001128955,0.48547,0.0005174776,0.001326189,0.001703477,0.0005981998,0.4020849,0.07722625,0.01781964,0.01133543,0.0005972165],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3174339,0.002153617,0.677179,0.0001640125,0.00009835657,0.0002215439,0.0007992284,0.00073266,0.001217636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7532629,0.001172699,0.2422611,0.0002791737,0.00007031392,0.0002870367,0.001388664,0.0003233361,0.0009548441],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9785173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1136126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05588167805296448,"score_gpt":0.2386630703284153,"score_spread":0.1827813922754508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}