{"id":"W1980699165","doi":"10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0290","title":"A visual analog scale for measuring dental fluorosis severity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of the American Dental Association","topic":"Fluoride Effects and Removal","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute; Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Visual analogue scale; Intraclass correlation; Medicine; Dentistry; Spearman's rank correlation coefficient; Rank correlation; Molar; Dental fluorosis; Orthodontics; Gold standard (test); Fluoride; Surgery; Mathematics; Statistics; Internal medicine; Psychometrics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001257175,0.00009856844,0.000185861,0.00002095042,0.0003182324,0.00003620253,0.0003866815,0.00002617191,0.00005143717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001150714,0.0000545459,0.0002296214,0.0002224106,0.0001330566,0.0002215683,0.0001441899,0.0001818597,0.00003981629],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00130262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000109297,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002969236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004703112,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986184,0.0002142783,0.0002587711,0.00007995379,0.0006129488,0.0002157067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998799,0.0001726969,0.0008499476,0.0000995233,0.00002162519,0.00005717039],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003235398,0.0002602632,0.7771245,0.000004259654,0.0001281983,0.00000122712,0.0008345965,0.003203222,0.1586709,0.000001752269,0.009510509,0.04993706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005015722,0.0002343169,0.9676388,0.00001610227,0.0001464842,0.0001051409,0.0004842597,0.003001726,0.02624181,0.0000619226,0.00144394,0.0001239286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978855,0.00002848972,0.0001769227,0.001245227,0.000291329,0.000157601,0.000004907909,0.000007788668,0.000202219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982932,0.0000204202,0.0004975764,0.0004658862,0.0003515464,0.000001521803,5.18075e-7,0.00001163829,0.0003577438],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1905143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3406307,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004991925565791767,"score_gpt":0.227965373945489,"score_spread":0.2229734483796972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}