{"id":"W1980862502","doi":"10.1080/14728028.2006.9752563","title":"AESTHETIC AND BIOLOGICAL PERCEPTIONS OF SUCCESSIONAL FOREST","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forests Trees and Livelihoods","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Argument (complex analysis); Geography; Forest management; Vegetation (pathology); Beauty; Preference; Environmental resource management; Psychology; Forestry; Environmental science; Mathematics; Aesthetics; Biology; Art","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007274628,0.00008480244,0.0001151122,0.00002300531,0.0001153454,0.0000101328,0.00005777467,0.00006025072,0.0004471133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003245211,0.00005918897,0.00002662029,0.00006562853,0.0003281713,0.00006675671,0.00008715623,0.00005702239,0.00002121482],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001199424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005344919,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003183416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02339301,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994153,0.00001963148,0.0001284476,0.0001740308,0.0001018285,0.0001607772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997814,0.00001688247,0.00004237286,0.0000782315,0.000004032172,0.00007707845],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000916411,0.00005453852,0.9935586,0.000003779407,7.1157e-7,0.00000146043,0.00007774651,0.00002608995,0.0001466103,0.001154905,0.001311496,0.003654841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002044428,0.0002192731,0.9944558,0.00001184538,0.000005762136,0.0000174461,0.00006508245,0.0003227851,0.000002723428,0.003198947,0.001419732,0.00007619758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978921,0.0002498635,0.0001305457,0.0003830138,0.00001417575,0.00008141095,0.00001052044,0.00001246516,0.001225911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998597,0.0001166942,0.0008129792,0.0000473221,0.00003099371,0.000005842772,0.00000990556,0.000004964635,0.0003742934],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02020959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944275,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009424148965901508,"score_gpt":0.2382084922358103,"score_spread":0.2287843432699087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}