{"id":"W1980903392","doi":"10.1007/s11896-014-9151-4","title":"“HIGH-RISK”: A Useful Tool for Improving Police Decision-Making in Hostage and Barricade Incidents","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"International Centre for Comparative Criminology; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Situational ethics; Psychology; Checklist; Intervention (counseling); Sample (material); Legal psychology; Criminology; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Cognitive psychology; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001273858,0.00009492059,0.0002347647,0.0002823186,0.0002258327,0.00008240388,0.0001890614,0.0001080928,0.00005705784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003628466,0.00008486013,0.00009227591,0.000104154,0.0001293373,0.0002611433,0.00004367226,0.0002298546,0.000002210279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002928653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01322334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00992204,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987788,0.0001749757,0.0004517314,0.0001603521,0.0001551204,0.0002790806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988858,0.0004527316,0.000360631,0.00009322775,0.00009585467,0.0001117784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001037126,0.0004990459,0.3326818,0.0001434993,0.00009318368,0.00001470931,0.163033,0.000009686786,0.002275544,0.006921228,0.006998514,0.4862926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002632626,0.001542978,0.9441052,0.0002583067,0.00020614,0.0001587434,0.02856116,0.00007971959,0.00003612721,0.009333,0.01279564,0.0002903851],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893731,0.0001554622,0.009109976,0.0005524332,0.0003159927,0.00009850269,0.000007639208,0.000004208193,0.0003826975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996541,0.0001615667,0.001733284,0.0009625671,0.0005510255,0.000003641986,2.174233e-7,0.00000905106,0.00003762759],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6114234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933477,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03415547395884062,"score_gpt":0.4180467561217972,"score_spread":0.3838912821629566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}