{"id":"W1980903642","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.10.020","title":"Methodologic discussions for using and interpreting composite endpoints are limited, but still identify major concerns","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":216,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"MEDLINE; Meaning (existential); Medicine; Sample size determination; Intervention (counseling); Citation; Disadvantage; Psychology; Statistics; Computer science; Psychotherapist; Library science; Political science; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7025478,0.004198048,0.009121344,0.01515822,0.003565503,0.01174743,0.01290165,0.008256669,0.005869132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9041196,0.003343965,0.008830561,0.01816788,0.01259536,0.01029408,0.006286514,0.01363732,0.002363782],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004977048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01373585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003869395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006871603,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1739454,0.658154,0.1144527,0.008289692,0.04400728,0.001150885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.06194698,0.8381324,0.02758508,0.03972439,0.03198959,0.0006215917],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003202382,0.000530478,0.02623348,0.1661338,0.03064242,0.0007516188,0.00952034,0.003092306,0.002079528,0.1324554,0.06601854,0.5593396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005078329,0.001822261,0.0342143,0.1896358,0.03404484,0.004263146,0.005285917,0.01522911,0.009252431,0.5187972,0.1808324,0.001544194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.007342267,0.1538525,0.6960436,0.09501038,0.01879922,0.01398565,0.004582014,0.0009662556,0.009418203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1017544,0.03573447,0.7614564,0.05058231,0.007690604,0.03814254,0.001944338,0.0008304688,0.001864502],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2974522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3668115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9820017511959729,"score_gpt":0.7767224192234639,"score_spread":0.205279331972509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}