{"id":"W1980942829","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00141.x","title":"Beyond Prejudice: Thinking toward Genuine Inclusion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learning Disabilities Research and Practice","topic":"Global Educational Policies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Canterbury","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Prejudice (legal term); Inclusion (mineral); Learning disability; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Hegemony; Mainstreaming; Special education; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Politics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02064271,0.0007653572,0.0006668218,0.002317333,0.01206275,0.01358405,0.0020706,0.006204643,0.002196665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01742671,0.0002570682,0.0007531149,0.001183492,0.1109838,0.02175152,0.0135487,0.01125498,0.0004005803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00761435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008927819,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004312771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00404532,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9780777,0.01567136,0.0004282048,0.001589322,0.002422311,0.001811199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897853,0.005913502,0.001072117,0.001280348,0.001057138,0.000891802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005650053,0.000008838882,0.0001830744,0.00002679545,0.000003265133,0.00005365434,0.0327126,0.00008637388,0.00007903174,0.9636512,0.0005710648,0.002618466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008012315,0.00001999217,0.0001500552,0.0001323012,0.000006505784,0.00006025948,0.02504315,0.0001791503,0.0002978077,0.9371526,0.03693999,0.00001025142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1116534,0.00618406,0.06916746,0.2990686,0.001642883,0.0001199731,0.00002785943,0.0001405228,0.5119953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736753,0.001456593,0.005906703,0.009905673,0.0003108859,0.0001267903,0.00001145251,0.00005178917,0.008554914],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02064271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1091704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07635751472381128,"score_gpt":0.465124359512783,"score_spread":0.3887668447889717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}