{"id":"W1980942829","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00141.x","title":"Beyond Prejudice: Thinking toward Genuine Inclusion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learning Disabilities Research and Practice","topic":"Global Educational Policies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Canterbury","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Prejudice (legal term); Inclusion (mineral); Learning disability; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Hegemony; Mainstreaming; Special education; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Politics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006099982,0.0000851407,0.0001046214,0.00007574607,0.004373967,0.0003112595,0.0002707653,0.0001017757,0.0005249057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02340367,0.00006775976,0.00003175137,0.0003514753,0.001106917,0.001002062,0.0006327845,0.0007285689,0.000119962],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002955488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003118005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01183432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007108954,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996748,0.00104535,0.0001658425,0.000236553,0.001217942,0.0005863114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946302,0.004503973,0.00005858631,0.0001298739,0.0004308312,0.0002465737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002169083,0.0002945256,0.003226996,0.00006343518,0.00003220617,0.000001714332,0.5505164,0.0001769835,0.00007311744,0.375323,0.0123787,0.05769606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008693989,0.0001265819,0.0005540248,0.00001404851,0.000003652353,0.000005014824,0.2121262,0.00003179185,0.000006497488,0.03355018,0.7534204,0.00007473159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2698124,0.002488673,0.00001024248,0.1988012,0.0001521311,0.0002561907,0.000002836545,0.00007326516,0.5284031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640277,0.002240381,0.0009187,0.0008087548,0.001281838,0.00001999512,0.000008797159,0.00001055884,0.03068329],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7410417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969222,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07635751472381128,"score_gpt":0.465124359512783,"score_spread":0.3887668447889717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}