{"id":"W1980981541","doi":"10.1016/s0265-931x(01)00031-5","title":"The cost-effectiveness of residential radon remediation programmes: assumptions about benefits stream profiles over time","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Radioactivity","topic":"Radioactivity and Radon Measurements","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Radon; Environmental remediation; Environmental science; Cost effectiveness; Cost–benefit analysis; Time horizon; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Environmental economics; Environmental health; Environmental resource management; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Medicine; Economics; Contamination; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003404198,0.0002574674,0.0005361332,0.0001542874,0.000969453,0.00002537653,0.0003225783,0.0002485749,0.0005536922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003710329,0.0001859398,0.0002934444,0.0001745911,0.0003038025,0.0007958853,0.0000710736,0.001005419,0.0000782986],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009411112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007883443,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003517592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002664899,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994832,0.002388159,0.0009103739,0.0002505667,0.001120238,0.0004986856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959528,0.001779621,0.001611346,0.0003804329,0.00006398767,0.0002117892],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002325627,0.004617841,0.5478911,0.0004194463,0.001134407,0.00003515952,0.001742407,0.0007031218,0.2394655,0.0001634428,0.005105411,0.1963965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002721262,0.0003963231,0.9818133,0.0003969543,0.0001900707,0.00003217909,0.0002780329,0.0003666272,0.01035908,0.00006589448,0.003172838,0.000207453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947767,0.001640332,0.0002881045,0.0002112363,0.0009045577,0.001616334,0.0001042238,0.00001849391,0.0004400309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970509,0.00189088,0.000132559,0.00002196009,0.0004721558,0.00007428114,0.00001000351,0.00003526644,0.0003120053],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4339221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7582403,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04965656148176538,"score_gpt":0.3384130476043565,"score_spread":0.2887564861225911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}