{"id":"W1980981541","doi":"10.1016/s0265-931x(01)00031-5","title":"The cost-effectiveness of residential radon remediation programmes: assumptions about benefits stream profiles over time","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Radioactivity","topic":"Radioactivity and Radon Measurements","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Radon; Environmental remediation; Environmental science; Cost effectiveness; Cost–benefit analysis; Time horizon; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Environmental economics; Environmental health; Environmental resource management; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Medicine; Economics; Contamination; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01996657,0.001692679,0.002713115,0.002046496,0.0006868175,0.004053208,0.003190576,0.006170062,0.009317277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08352406,0.002176293,0.004087367,0.00248063,0.003122651,0.007031148,0.001690096,0.003473873,0.001010198],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005320196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002750991,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02017866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01103241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939884,0.002989754,0.0003013976,0.0006358949,0.0006814835,0.001403098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9326469,0.05979971,0.003914906,0.001532706,0.001468287,0.0006375076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00300271,0.0003231031,0.01909363,0.0004066409,0.0005016032,0.0004226396,0.0002131724,0.896637,0.0007356521,0.03822661,0.00147132,0.03896598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005608831,0.001985332,0.05231148,0.0003920658,0.002369584,0.001212639,0.000855115,0.8434083,0.00159289,0.091178,0.003948015,0.0001856244],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8276739,0.004730893,0.1052558,0.01145598,0.0002099793,0.00148766,0.007538934,0.0002909692,0.04135606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844764,0.001287362,0.006351024,0.0006527859,0.00009033424,0.0002320299,0.0007296903,0.00003602436,0.006144371],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02017866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1055945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04965656148176538,"score_gpt":0.3384130476043565,"score_spread":0.2887564861225911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}