{"id":"W1980999663","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.07.002","title":"Evidence for the use of a numerical rating scale to assess the intensity of pediatric pain","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Pain","topic":"Pediatric Pain Management Techniques","field":"Medicine","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre; Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Generalitat de Catalunya","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Discriminant validity; Intensity (physics); Physical therapy; Rating scale; Construct validity; Medicine; Quality of life (healthcare); Convergent validity; Visual analogue scale; Psychology; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02422801,0.0001109801,0.0003187849,0.0001545019,0.00006206339,0.00002302289,0.0003989057,0.00001579682,0.000006807961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02036431,0.0000614073,0.0002113526,0.0004436828,0.00004541856,0.0001157057,0.00006932821,0.0002635085,0.0000011691],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003369949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005642133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003910345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.009255e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962189,0.002307196,0.0007491201,0.000116539,0.0004307187,0.0001775795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939268,0.004498037,0.0006905974,0.00032777,0.0004673027,0.00008953651],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001543702,0.0005618364,0.3070131,0.00043932,0.000219426,0.0002236476,0.002144767,0.0007701698,0.0138251,0.00006116642,0.4467786,0.2264192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00118567,0.007219055,0.9625263,0.001098651,0.001066929,0.00007033574,0.0008544165,0.01307441,0.000926474,0.000123984,0.01158803,0.0002657195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1368495,0.0005413342,0.8555222,0.006371246,0.0000629125,0.0005457625,0.000001458731,0.00002229006,0.00008331355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9506641,0.0002616165,0.04480892,0.003524957,0.0006680879,0.000001590359,3.093436e-7,0.00001536036,0.00005505229],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8138146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9878876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1810064105836432,"score_gpt":0.3470779225940293,"score_spread":0.1660715120103861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}