{"id":"W1980999663","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.07.002","title":"Evidence for the use of a numerical rating scale to assess the intensity of pediatric pain","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Pain","topic":"Pediatric Pain Management Techniques","field":"Medicine","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre; Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Generalitat de Catalunya","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Discriminant validity; Intensity (physics); Physical therapy; Rating scale; Construct validity; Medicine; Quality of life (healthcare); Convergent validity; Visual analogue scale; Psychology; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05727357,0.0008094076,0.0009789892,0.004414418,0.0004631418,0.00235698,0.00251267,0.002072762,0.005152676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2361362,0.0007267306,0.001372896,0.004641659,0.004129124,0.001969591,0.001410346,0.00164047,0.001342885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001185124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001652375,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003797346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003111431,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9425717,0.02948342,0.00706396,0.004905962,0.01542079,0.0005543056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4802286,0.4289865,0.03399627,0.0121251,0.04361515,0.001048297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002159882,0.0004451616,0.5030793,0.01454786,0.002769744,0.0003765777,0.003366298,0.001463354,0.001724294,0.009662659,0.004817083,0.4555878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004402048,0.003111386,0.892828,0.02700411,0.00130974,0.00324745,0.003056083,0.003329414,0.002581908,0.00472189,0.05815696,0.0002128689],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.370987,0.4743699,0.06104256,0.01418137,0.003047089,0.0006608639,0.002829117,0.0002754276,0.07260665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8608214,0.08547489,0.04497486,0.003628886,0.001057096,0.0005617929,0.001632794,0.0001565914,0.001691807],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05727357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3028952,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1810064105836432,"score_gpt":0.3470779225940293,"score_spread":0.1660715120103861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}