{"id":"W1981145324","doi":"10.1007/s10592-007-9307-1","title":"Taxonomic status and conservation strategy of the endangered red wolf: a response to Kyle et al. (2006)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Endangered species; Biology; Biodiversity; Biodiversity conservation; Conservation status; Ecology; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001227526,0.0001307425,0.0001308307,0.00005773778,0.0001449588,0.00002245606,0.0001607676,0.00009821774,0.0001634413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004018612,0.000121368,0.0000317851,0.0003860426,0.0002289031,0.0001211632,0.0001362321,0.0001123712,0.00003427975],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001148036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001096751,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003128285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002227242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986441,0.0002252794,0.0004049625,0.0002685662,0.0001964377,0.0002607118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989011,0.0003865647,0.00022564,0.0003286429,0.00005580044,0.0001022591],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003836594,0.00003376868,0.9227442,0.000003462537,0.000008967396,7.457775e-7,0.0003140576,0.0005460387,0.03565742,0.0001402177,0.03831516,0.001852258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004188307,0.0000868602,0.9027165,0.000009361755,0.00001193217,0.000003100575,0.0001408992,0.0006302872,0.00398715,0.0002778328,0.09159824,0.0001190727],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9698091,0.00003956441,0.001110575,0.02782741,0.0001440333,0.0004847338,0.0000199244,0.00002338107,0.0005412549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969315,0.00003625381,0.002650318,0.02734267,0.000009535581,0.00002182532,0.00001232912,0.00001225446,0.0005998294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05328307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4949242,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02029150258035381,"score_gpt":0.2480602770277835,"score_spread":0.2277687744474297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}