{"id":"W1981274898","doi":"10.1179/wsc.2005.17.1.11","title":"Analyzing the Distribution of Moisture Content in Kiln-dried Lumber Using Goodness of Fit Techniques – with Procedures","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Institute of Wood Science","topic":"Wood Treatment and Properties","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Weibull distribution; Log-normal distribution; Goodness of fit; Kiln; Water content; Mathematics; Statistics; Empirical distribution function; Moisture; Probability distribution; Green wood; Wood drying; Distribution (mathematics); Environmental science; Engineering; Materials science; Composite material; Waste management; Geotechnical engineering; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006229588,0.0005482002,0.0005642075,0.002719948,0.0005033824,0.0009760509,0.0009796913,0.0007067473,0.002953401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02162979,0.0003340387,0.001078682,0.001612125,0.001146295,0.001377614,0.000724593,0.0007546415,0.0006558157],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006972033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006433084,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001879982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003058238,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973148,0.0009582317,0.0001899133,0.0004100672,0.001010776,0.000116268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854542,0.009085356,0.001815764,0.002234891,0.001309351,0.0001003679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006467317,0.0004467062,0.2056873,0.0005964083,0.0008655547,0.001226585,0.00179902,0.2408717,0.07804734,0.05597609,0.002882586,0.4109539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006106012,0.0006148306,0.1922111,0.0001237619,0.0001105399,0.002827925,0.0007146196,0.7072981,0.0446433,0.04433794,0.006780787,0.0002760198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1015635,0.00009344002,0.8956438,0.00006620306,0.00001453462,0.00007653296,0.0003541211,0.0008270472,0.001360829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7492092,0.0001365987,0.2482705,0.00006769082,0.00002145679,0.0002864211,0.001082852,0.00028261,0.0006426226],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006229588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03294563,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03188488388012718,"score_gpt":0.2476251288624358,"score_spread":0.2157402449823086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}