{"id":"W1981439416","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.12.036","title":"Investigating groundwater flow paths within proglacial moraine using multiple geophysical methods","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrology","topic":"Geophysical Methods and Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Bedrock; Geology; Moraine; Electrical resistivity tomography; Terminal moraine; Geomorphology; Groundwater; Ground-penetrating radar; Glacial period; Seismic refraction; Groundwater flow; Snowmelt; Hydrology (agriculture); Geophysics; Aquifer; Snow; Geotechnical engineering; Radar","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002746573,0.0003802461,0.0004204758,0.001390465,0.0004774609,0.0007088198,0.0004642241,0.0004029357,0.0004477606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007675085,0.0002822912,0.0004214098,0.0009399917,0.0002935049,0.0004631536,0.0005054128,0.0002793366,0.00007692837],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004006829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007409683,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02249805,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998935,0.00002015321,0.000006185026,0.00003352719,0.00002384834,0.00002270481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996991,0.0001136285,0.00004741322,0.00003307443,0.00007134416,0.00003534335],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001037269,0.0005198721,0.404148,0.0001800661,0.0004316691,0.001583425,0.001657554,0.2698058,0.1526843,0.002623731,0.0006680474,0.1646604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006244038,0.0001559781,0.1184362,0.00001597068,0.0001136251,0.0002402655,0.0005175999,0.8671521,0.01148173,0.0007424798,0.001039526,0.00004206458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887657,0.00008189434,0.01001245,0.0000433733,0.000009295632,0.00001332672,0.0001276338,0.0001340746,0.0008122539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870138,0.00004727485,0.01257375,0.000004701796,0.000005239063,0.00001037848,0.00008951781,0.000009555881,0.0002457721],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.012707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02526605,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05754222182696297,"score_gpt":0.3073012579216245,"score_spread":0.2497590360946616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}