{"id":"W1981730694","doi":"10.1016/s0167-7012(03)00042-3","title":"The edaphic quantitative protargol stain: a sampling protocol for assessing soil ciliate abundance and diversity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Microbiological Methods","topic":"Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Edaphic; Ciliate; Prokaryote; Biology; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Trophic level; Microbial ecology; Biodiversity; Soil water; Bacteria","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005177493,0.0001327838,0.0002865589,0.00002030985,0.001278053,0.00004036181,0.0003445345,0.0001388109,0.0001523158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001595122,0.00007590761,0.0001101973,0.0001057604,0.0006328092,0.0001392011,0.0003532127,0.000472486,0.000002757038],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007269888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003155651,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001030992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004293658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966695,0.00248982,0.0003555974,0.0001593031,0.00004415968,0.0002816397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966456,0.002687013,0.0004223621,0.0001226355,0.00005773732,0.00006465831],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009310221,0.0002388955,0.01680882,0.0000440662,0.00008744293,0.000004162994,0.0006737362,0.0003694106,0.9636452,0.00169482,0.0009955536,0.01450683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006712463,0.00586401,0.1100753,0.0002131981,0.0001460138,0.0006258529,0.002492625,0.0003708055,0.05941537,0.2329714,0.5800296,0.001083387],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.8167623,0.000109344,0.1566986,0.0004697411,0.0002184218,0.02524183,0.000007145296,0.00001403618,0.0004786096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1028875,0.00003703843,0.8927763,0.0006229916,0.00004262306,0.003522559,0.000001081669,0.00001240494,0.00009748916],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9042299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9829876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1539115374564999,"score_gpt":0.4494122045252134,"score_spread":0.2955006670687135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}