{"id":"W1981974420","doi":"10.1006/ijhc.1999.0380","title":"Evaluating a domain-specialist-oriented knowledge management system","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Rotation formalisms in three dimensions; Usability; Human–computer interaction; Domain knowledge; Domain (mathematical analysis); Feature (linguistics); Hierarchy; Knowledge management; Process (computing); Software engineering; Knowledge base; Task (project management); Attractiveness; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Programming language; Systems engineering; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001070656,0.0001935722,0.0003275355,0.0004795811,0.0001692325,0.0002306732,0.001874084,0.0000323013,0.00002771664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000413825,0.0001665671,0.0001779416,0.0002736156,0.0000638166,0.0004440518,0.0005824706,0.0002290455,0.00008543344],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005215529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004083955,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002214998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001533344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973816,0.0001230626,0.000698226,0.0002898957,0.001229534,0.0002777114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978402,0.0003615078,0.0002227129,0.0002972163,0.001191074,0.0000873391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001017363,0.0005541329,0.00135793,0.000274073,0.005209689,0.003019628,0.01877783,0.005408114,0.0001973665,0.2100349,0.01928678,0.7357778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04064071,0.00972022,0.1910901,0.01895343,0.0005862256,0.0117782,0.009686507,0.159497,0.003078956,0.02524856,0.5235366,0.006183538],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3893887,0.004513348,0.586844,0.0009152985,0.01140181,0.0003722676,0.000003671333,0.0003775566,0.006183351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.770832,0.0002043854,0.2243095,0.0001009632,0.00353095,0.00002118604,0.000001540997,0.00002750163,0.0009719526],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7295942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6792411,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06461842349918082,"score_gpt":0.4004732465168877,"score_spread":0.3358548230177069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}